With the exception of the Honorable Chief Judge Jocelyn K. Fabry (who handed down the original sentences), hell of a justice system you have there Sault tribe... The story below is from today's Escanaba Daily Press.
SAULT STE. MARIE - A recent appeals decision in tribal court has reversed or modified sentences against three Rapid River men found guilty of 79 fishing-related violations last year. Details on the court decision have been made available to the Daily Press.
Andrew Schwartz, John Schwartz and Kevin Schwartz - brothers and members of the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians - were sentenced in August by a tribal judge. Each had their right to fish taken away permanently and were ordered to pay $13,175 in fines and costs and $15,214 in restitution.
The three had been ticketed for 105 civil infractions connected to illegal fishing operations on Little Bay de Noc in 2009. The citations were the result of an investigation by the Department of Natural Resources and Environment (DNRE).
In September 2010, about a month after their sentencing, the Schwartzes filed an appeal to the tribal judgement and requested the court's "findings of responsibility, costs, fines, restitution, forfeiture and loss of fishing license be set aside."
After seven months, the appellate court decision was released last week, specifically upholding (sustaining) and ruling against (reversing) parts of the initial judgments made in tribal court.
On April 12, the appellate court ordered the following:
1 - The court ruling the Schwartzes illegally sold fish on Feb. 17, 20 and 23, 2009, was sustained.
2 - The court ruling the Schwartzes illegally sold fish on other days was reversed.
3 - The court ruling the Schwartzes possessed more than 100 pounds of fish on Feb. 17 and 20, 2009, was sustained.
4 - The court ruling the Schwartzes illegally possessed more than 100 pounds of fish on all other days was reversed.
5 - The court ruling the Schwartzes violated the catch report provisions was sustained.
6 - The court ruling the Schwartzes were illegally engaged in subsistence fishing with a non-native was reversed.
7 - The court's forfeiture of four snowmobiles was sustained.
8 - The court's order for $15,214 restitution, representing the economic value of the fish, was reduced to $3,349.
9 - The court's lifetime revocation of the Schwartzes subsistence fishing rights was reduced to a one-year suspension beginning April 12, 2011.
10 - The Schwartzes' due process rights were not violated because their attorney failed to appear at an Oct. 8, 2010, hearing on the fairness of the court's restitution decision.
Appellate judges offered comments on how the DNRE conducted its investigation into the illegal fishing operations.
An investigative concern was that the DNRE would have sought direct evidence rather than indirect or circumstantial evidence, defining direct evidence as evidence that stands on its own merit and defining indirect or circumstantial evidence as evidence that requires certain assumptions.
Concern was also expressed the investigation should have been a joint effort between the DNRE and the Sault Tribe Law Enforcement.
Other individuals cited for violations in connection with the above investigation are brothers Troy Jensen and Wade Jensen, tribally-licensed commercial fishermen, and non-native John Halverson, a state-licensed wholesaler. The three men, from the Garden Peninsula, are each charged with unlawfully conspiring with one another and four others to buy/sell fish taken without a commercial fishing license from 2004-2009 in Delta County.
What a joke the tribal courts desision is. The DNR watched the Scwartz's for 5 years illegally selling fish along with the guys who fenced the illegally caught fish.
This is in no way sustinence fishing!
We need to stop pretending this is an appropriate punishment,it isn't!
I think there needs to be an investigation to find out what other legal avenue there is to seek an appropriate sentance to be applied to these theives.
I don't think this will go away until the Schwartz's and the other people involved are dealt with appropriatley by a "real court". But thats what they would like,to have it just "go away".